Sunday, April 30, 2006

Doctor Who Season 2 Episode 3: School Reunion

Photobucket - Video and Image HostingThey keep getting better, there's not much more to say than that about the quality of this episode. Longtime Doctor Who fans like me get treated to a return of Sarah Jane and K9 and everyone gets another action-filled, quick-paced Doctor Who adventure.

Where this episode excels over the past two is the Deus Ex Machina isn't as extreme. That is, there's always a magic bullet fix, but this one was well set up and didn't leave any aftertaste. The story flowed and it was quite interesting to watch the new companion meet the old.

Once again the episode plugs Torchwood and I'm thinking that may be our Bad Wolf of the season. You're left wondering if Sarah Jane is going to be seen on Torchwood. There's nothing on the official site about it, but you the possibility is definitely there.

In summary, great story, great plot devices, great reintroduction of an old character: This ep = A+ (100!).

Saturday, April 29, 2006

United 93

Well, what can I say. We went to the 4 p.m. showing and have been intermittenly bawling ever since about 4:45 p.m. Everything you've read or heard is true. The movie casts no judgements, lays no blame and plays the events as true to life as possible.

And it's an emotional punch in the gut.

I mean, you know what you're getting yourself into when you see this movie. It's not entertaining. It's painful. But, in a way, I felt like it was my duty to see it -- that this is a recharge for a battery. The battery that's powering our national will.

I understand if you can't go see this movie. But I think everyone else should.

Review: Tool - 10,000 Days

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting If you are a Tool fan, then you mostly likely sighed with great relief when their new album 10,000 Days was announced. But, there's always the inevitable questions that both precede and succeed such announcements: "What are they doing?" "Are they breaking up?" "Why did it take so long to make the album?" "Is it going to be worth the wait?"

Well, anyone willing to go check out their website or the quarter of the internet devoted to talking about these guys can find out that the band is well and good. I can't answer the last two questions, I don't know and you'll have the answer the last one for yourself.

I will tell you that if you liked Lateralus this new offering is well worth your time. There are no surprises here. There are plenty of the ambient harmonics and odd polyrythms that Tool are famous for. And, honestly, I'd probably have to listen to this album for a good long time before I can specifically point out the amazing moments because there is so much going on in their music that it takes time to ingest it. I will say that the first four songs on the album will just blow you away.

10,000 Days is another great album. I don't know if I was jonesing for a new Tool fix, but it certainly is nice to have one. Highly recommended.

Friday, April 28, 2006

Because I'm All About the Guitar: Take that Banjo PlayersCat Stranglers

If you don't like this solo, you are teh gay. Or into the banjo. Which is roughly the same thing.

UPDATE: I tried to fix it, but I can't even post new files to Putfile right now. I'm going to have to find a better place to host audio, methinks. I might have to swallow my pride and buy a damn domain.

UPDATE the second and bump: OK, finally got Putfile to post a re-edited, redone file. Please click here for the new file and please let me know if this one works for you.

Oh, and bonus points to anyone who can tell me the name of the artist and song.

Previous installments:
Pt. 26: Because I'm all about the re-post
Part 25: Charvel sucks
Part 24: I'm lazy
Part 23: Rob Zombie's Educated Horses, a review
Part 22.5: An awesome video
Part 22: Fretting over the board
Part 21.4: A shout out;
Part 21: Cop Out;
Part 20: Lenny Kravitz;
Part 19: Is it guitar or is it Korg?;
Part 18: A beautiful guitar;
Part 17: Getting all amped up over the sound;
Part 16: Not quite plug and play;
Part 15.25: Don't let Gibson buy your company;
Part 15: The greatest guitarist you've never heard of;
Part 14: The finish;
Part 13: Vernon Reid;
Part 12: The vibrato tremolo;
Part 11: Jimmy Page;
Part 10: What's in the wood?;
Part 9: Rebuilding a guitar;
Part 8: G3 2005;
Part 7: John Petrucci;
Part 6: Chingon;
Part 5: Home recording on the cheapity cheap;
Part 4.01: Guitar Zen;
Part 4: Full service Friday -- concert going in 1993;
Part 3.5: Gretsch guitars;
Part 3: The Reverend Horton Heat;
Part 2: Back when I thought I could play;
Part 1: Zakk Wylde then and now

Housekeeping

Okay, I finally got off my butt and added some links on my roll that I should have done a while ago: IMAO, 'nuff said; Memento Moron, because of superb content, a wealth of links from Pints and he jumped on the plagiarism bandwagon; Mountaineer Musings, because Sarahk shares my passion/disdain for America Idol; and Vultures Row because Vulture 6 also jumped on the plagiarism bandwagon and he's a fellow military man.

Now, go forth and read them if you are among those who don't already.

Plagiarism redux, again

Apparently, I didn't write this post myself. And Kaavya Viswanathan didn't actually write her own book.

Thursday, April 27, 2006

I'm just trying to be a better person

Photobucket - Video and Image HostingMike O'Malley, cousin of our favorite literary/acting blogger, appeared on My Name is Earl tonight, ratcheting up the the cool points of my favorite sitcom considerably.

Money Quote: When you ran, I didn't reach for my gun, I reached for my bowling ball.

Amityville Anthropomorphics

Blog-friend Tracey had a disturbing comment on one of her posts recently. This led to her posting a lengthy response to the commenter. Well, we commenters analyzed and discussed and, like the AD/HD aflicted bunch we all are, we veered the topic to something only schizophrenically connected: Demonic Toys.

Photobucket - Video and Image HostingSheila really summed up the sentiment best when she said: "Children’s toys come to life = Lifelong emotional scars." So, what are some of your strongest children's toys are evil and frightening moments? Movies, TV, real life ... let it out, this is your catharsis.

Me, as I mentioned at Tracey's, the clown scene in Poltergeist has left me with both a lifelong fear of clowns and marrionettes.

I mean, I could never watch coach without thinking that every night he was going to sleep on an indian burial ground. Well, that's a lie, but one that sounds funny.

We'll rise again dammit!



Dixie Royal

You are 89% true Southern!

You are pure belle or gentleman! You know your Jones Soda, Nehi and RC colas, your Moon Pies and sweet potato pie; you'd absolutely die without air conditioners in the summer, and you've seen Steel Magnolias and Fried Green Tomatoes (or read the book!). Your grandmother lives in an antebellum home and has a cook who makes the best fried chicken and asparagus casserole and summer squash and everything else in the world. And you know the taste of honeysuckle and the feel of grass between your toes. You are blessed.

My test tracked 1 variable How you compared to other people your age and gender:





free online datingfree online dating
You scored higher than 82% on Southerliness
Link: The Southern-ness Test written by gwennykate on Ok Cupid, home of the 32-Type Dating Test


h/t Lisa.

Dead heroes go to Van Halen?

Once again getting my inspiration from FARK, here's a great post at Stuck in the 80s. It's an old debate: Which is the better band - Van Halen or Van Hagar? But the Stuck in the 80s blog is a great forum for the debate.

Personally, I think the author cheesed out by not coming right out and taking sides. He says that he likes both but if you pin him down he'll say old Van Halen. He backs this up in his top 5 VH album picks by only picking one Van Hagar offering.

My vote is for Diamond Dave-era Van Halen. I honestly don't even think of Hagar-era VH as the same band; which is why so many of us call them Van Hagar. A commentor on the 80s blog said that had Dave not left, the band would have broken up. I wonder if that might have been the best idea in the long run.

Wednesday, April 26, 2006

Idol vindication

Kellie Pickler is gone!!!!

Thank you Jesus.

On the vindication issue -- at the beginning of the episode, Ryan asked the judges if they felt differently tonight than they did last night. And Simon said, "Just one. Katharine, I felt it was a great performance." Sweet, sweet vindication.

A most heroic quest

Three men embark on what may the most heroic quest of the 21st century: finding the worst bar drink.

Here's an excerpt from their first stop:

Ye should be tryin' the Green Chartreuse!" he said. "Tis more terrible than the screech of a Ring Wraith riding its steed down yer throat!" Green Chartreuse is a liqueur that was invented when Satan was tired of peeing in the mouths of the damned with his eight-headed penis. Charlie dusted off the bottle from the nether regions of the bar, and as he opened the bottle I heard the bark of Cerebus, faintly, but distinctly. It didn't pour into the glasses so much as it flowed, its color and consistency an exact match for the mysterious green chemical they use to charge porto-potties. I thanked him, tipped him generously, gathered up the shots and brought them to our table.

Go read the whole thing; funniest thing I've seen in some time.

Tuesday, April 25, 2006

And then there were six: Idol liveblog 4/25

UPDATE: Sarah, as she said in my comments, is on a very different page than me this week.

UPDATE 2: Tracey also disagrees with me on many points. Except the main one -- The Pickle sucked.

UPDATE 3: Dean's thoughts are up and he's got Kellie and Paris at the bottom (as does Dial Idol for that matter).

UPDATE 4: Wizbang Pop!, as always, conveys the deeper ramifications of American Idol on the American psyche. Um, OK, not really, they're talking about Katharine's minor wardrobe malfuntion.

All Idols have two phone numbers tonight. Hmm, wonder why that's happening.

Italian superstar Andrea Bocelli is assisting the contestants tonight. Wonder if they'll listen.

BWAHAHAHAHA! The vocal warm up! Bocelli totally pwns and the producer pulls no punches. Fantastic! "Are these the finalists?" the producer asks.

1. Katharine: Singing a song made famous by Whitney (I Have Nothing), written by the producer who's helping them. She sounded bad at first, but it seems like she took their advice to heart. And she sang a really good duet with Bocelli.

Her live performance ... wow, vocally I'm thinking this might be her absolute best performance. Quite good. WOW! At the end she really brings it home, she's doing more than singing -- she's putting herself in the song. Her personality is really coming through. Great job!

Judges: Randy - Thinks the song was too big for her. I really disagree. She was very good. Paula - Also didn't think much, but she doesn't ever think much, does she? Simon - By choosing that song you're saying that you're as good as Whitney, and you're not. Well, I agree that she's not as good as Whitney, but she didn't necessarily sing like her either.

Again, thought it was a very good performance. I mean, if you make a song your own, you don't have to be better than the original performance.

2. Elliot: Resinging his audition song ... I kind of feel like this is Elliot's domain. He should do quite well.

The background scenes this week are quite revealing and I think the producer dude (can't ever catch his name for some reason) is really helping these guys out. I think he gave Elliot some advice that really helped.

Again, like Sheila has mentioned here and elsewhere, Elliot just makes this all seem so effortless. He's so good, on pure vocal talent. He just doesn't sell the song on stage like some of the others. Tonight's a bit better perhaps, his vocals are like honey, with butter, on velvet. I mean, his best vocals ever. These guys are ratcheting it up.

Judges: Randy - Didn't like the arrangement, but I liked your vox. Paula - You know, I can't even follow what the hell she's saying. Really, I've lost it. She sounds like Drew Barrymore, trying to create her own metaphors, only one-eighth as coherent. Simon - Superb vox.

3. The Pickle: Who isn't dreading this?

Hey y'all, I'm single! Hey y'all, I'm singing that Unchained Mel-o-dy song. You know, I'm gonna sing it like LeAnn Rimes like every other song I sing.

Man, they're being nice to her, and aren't saying anything bad about her singing. But they didn't say anything good either.

Her performance: OK, so it hasn't started horribly. OK, so she can sign this, in her sytle. So, I must ask, what the hell's up with the Ed Grimly effing hairdo? Goodness she can't have both -- decent singing and decent wardrobe/hair. Oh well.

As I listen, I mean, I haven't cringed, but it's not fantastic. I've heard karaoke that's just as good or better.

Judges: Randy - Hey dog, dog, you think you butchered it, huh? It was very strange, not the right song. Paula - Um, um, um, I don't, I can't, um, I adore you, but um, where am I? Simon - That deserved tears, but for different reasons (Paula cried at Elliots performance - for those who missed it). There was no oomph.

The judges were right, though maybe a little harsher than needed. She wasn't bad, just not great. Not top six good. But then, we all knew that.

4. Paris: Both Bocelli and the producer dude thought she was fantastic, but they thought she should pull back her vox on the first eight bars or so. I think it's interesting and something I've been thinking she should probably have done on a few of her performances.

Performance: Very good start, whoop, a couple of flubs, but once the tempo picks up a bit, she really gets going ... and then she cuts in with her full vocal push and it was good transition. She's selling the song too. Very good stange presence even though she's camped out behind the mic stand, she's owning the stange. Very, very well done.

Judges: Randy - Yo, dog, yo, I wasn't blown away, but I liked it. Paula - I felt you oversang the song. Simon - Very good vox, but too old fashioned for my taste.

Hmm. She rocked, shut up judges.

5. Taylor: I'm psyched to hear what he's got up his sleeve.

Ah, the producer is David Foster! Finally heard it straight. Anywho, I get the impression that these guys are probably helping the contestants more than anyone else has.

Performance: Oooh, ouch, really pitchy to start (and they said some great things about him in the preview), but he quickly picks himself up starts the groove. It's a good song for him, but he just doesn't seem in it -- until the end, he opens up. Taylor just doesn't seem happy unless he's throwing his voice all the way out there. He doesn't seem very comfortable with the slow and emotional. But, the crowd's eating it up.

Judges: Randy - Completely the wrong song, not good. Paula - Not my favorite song for you. Simon - You looked uptight tonight ... outside of American Idol, you hear this performance at any nightclub or hotel bar.

They were right, but I don't think it was the song. He just wasn't on tonight. I bet Taylor could have eaten this song up on most any other night. Unfortunately, the night that mattered, he couldn't sell it. It wasn't the worst of the night (Kellie), but it wasn't a lot better. And that hurts me to say because he is my favorite performer.

6. Chris: Wonder if he's going to sing a rock ballad?

Hmm. They (Bocelli and Foster) were a little rough on Chris. As they should have been, he's signing a feckin' Bryan Adams song for God's sake.

Performance: Again, a pitchy start. I mean, the power's there and he closes each line stong, but the lyrics to get to those strong, punchy points are a bit warbly. Well, as he warms up to the song, it gets a little bit better. Still, not great, but not horrible. Better than Taylor.

Judges: Randy - Loved it. Paula - Loved it. Simon - Very good choice of song, great performance.

Hmm, I haven't agreed with these guys much tonight. I'm sure I'd feel different about his performance if I was there on the floor, but I'm listening to it here, and I could hear some pitchy issues.

Not a great night for my favorites. And as I listen to the recap, I give The Pickle worse marks than I did above. Man, I was really hoping to effortlessly enjoy myself tonight. It wasn't there. It just wasn't a lot of fun tonight. No one was amazingly good. No one was amazingly bad. It was one long hour of mediocrity.

Bottom 3 (3?): The Pickle was definitely the worst, Taylor may see the bottom three based on his performance, and lastly, I'd say Katharine, because Paris rocked hard and Chris has too many fans.

We'll see. They better step up the tempo next week dammit.

Internalize forever

Following up on Ken's post...

It's a small advance for society, I suppose, that Ms. Viswanathan didn't merely throw it all on the anonymous packager. And she did contribute some original material. She and her publisher have announced that future editions of her novel will offer more of it in place of the stolen bits. In software terms, that means that "Opal Mehta" was a beta version pawned off as a finished product, requiring patches and additional work that the consumer should have gotten in the first place. I was rather hoping that the practice wouldn't catch on elsewhere. (And I should know, since I Ken Nightfly ran a blog carnival that blew up in my Ken's his face some months back. Yes, it was my Ken's his fault.)

It's only Tuesday

Good lord. It's only Tuesday. Have these been the longest days in creation or is it just me? I've been busier than I've been in quite some time, but these days just seem to be dragging ...

Thank goodness for the simple pleasure that is American Idol -- that is, if it's actually pleasurable. I don't even have that assurance.

Well, continuing my good stuff theme from earlier, at least the work day is almost over for us East coasters.

The Good News Post

There is a lot of news hammering away at you every day. Most of it bad. The more I read, the more I get fed up with "so-and-so did this" and all the partisan bickering.

The truth is, I know where I stand politically, but I have lost faith in any politician to truly attempt to acheive that agenda.

So, I'm posting this today to get you folks to comment on some good news. Me, I just doubled my DSL speed -- fantastic!

Sunday, April 23, 2006

Doctor Who: Season 2 Ep. 2 - Tooth and Claw

Image hosting by PhotobucketSo, last week I gave The New Earth an A, which in retrospect might have been a high mark. Having watched it again, I might rate it a high B. But that's what you get at the beginning of the season. Big special effects, neat new scenery and the fact that you've waited the better part of a year for one of your favorite shows EVER to come back on the air can artificially raise the quality rating a bit. No worries though, it was still enjoyable.

However, tempered by a twice-watched season opener, I cranked up episode two: Tooth and Claw. The episode has Rose and the Doctor wanting to go to 1979 England but they wind up, shockingly in 1879.

Image hosting by PhotobucketThe plot rotates around a werewolf, the Queen of England, kung fu-practicing monks, and Torchwood. I'll leave plot devices at that, but for those of you staying in the know about such things, Torchwood is the name of an upcoming Doctor Who spinoff show that will star Capt. Jack of season one fame (it's also an anagram of Doctor Who).

This week's episode was a little scary for my younguns (I love that they love Doctor Who), but they still liked it enough. The story, while not captivating, didn't cheese out as much as last week. I give Tooth and Claw a B+.

One part Shakespeare, dash of Python, whole lotta internets

Thou villainous pox-marked apple-john!

Check out the Shakespeare insult generator.

Friday, April 21, 2006

Just for Emily: My Screenshot Friday

Image hosting by Photobucket

I've always found plastic pal who's fun to be with to be a double entendre, you?

Because I'm All About the Guitar Pt. 26: Because I'm all about the re-post

UPDATE: Could someone let me know if the link to the MP3 file works for them? I'm at work and our server is horrible.

I'm reposting Pt. 5 of my BIAAtG for a couple of reasons. First of all, and most importantly, I am lazy. Second, I almost forgot about it all together. Third, Dean posted something about home recording/podcasting a couple of days ago and made me think of this. So here's my repost of Home Recording on the Cheapity Cheap:

Shortly before I deployed to Afghanistan (ed. In late 2002), I got a wild hair about doing some home recording. There is and was a lot of information on the Web about how to do it right and economically. Well, I had issues with them.

First, I couldn’t afford to buy any of the equipment they suggested. I couldn’t afford a new sound card, an external input device or really nice recording software like Acid or Pro Tools. Secondly, not only could I not afford to set up a real cheap home studio, I didn’t really want to either. I wanted to see if I could overcome the obstacles given the equipment I had on hand.

Image hosted by Photobucket.comWhat did I have: A computer with the regular accoutrements (a Celeron 400MHz, so no barn burner, though this was 2002), an Ibanez Gi0 guitar, a Dean Playmate bass, a Fender Bullet Reverb practice amp, and Cool Edit Pro multi-track recording software (I also have a Rogue bass amp, but didn’t use it).

So, I had tools. Not great tools, but enough to accomplish the task. For those who are interested in playing around with multi-track recording and don’t have any real experience, Cool Edit is a neat program to use. It’s very user friendly and easy to learn. It’s not very powerful, but it’s cheap (I’m linking to a free download -- may be demo ware -- at the bottom). Cool Edit is now Adobe Audition, but the old 2.1 version is still readily available. But, there are lots of free audio editing programs out there if you go through Tucows or something.Image hosted by Photobucket.com

Before I tackled the problem of getting sound into the computer, I decided I needed to find a way to lay down a drum track. It was important to me to get the most realistic sounding drums I could without paying any money for software. I wound up running across a program called DRUMS. I used the demo version (linked at the bottom of the article). It’s a VERY time consuming process to lay down a drum track. BUT, I did discover the ability to copy and paste bars, which sped up the process a bit. If you’re doing a pretty simple song, it’s not that hard. I couldn’t imagine doing something really complex though.

So, I had a drum program, the ability to record the drums (if you have the demo version, you have to play the drum track and record it using an audio recorder on your computer; with the full version you can export directly to WAV), so I decided to play around with the program a bit. I found some neat sample drum beats and quickly laid down a simple pattern with repetitive fills. I used it as a click track to play guitar along with it, and decided I should attempt to lay down guitar and bass tracks.

This created a completely new dilemma. The little Fender has an export port. And I tried to run a line from the “External Speakers” jack into the computer’s Aux. Input and Microphone input. However, I can only assume that the amp’s line must act like a pre-amp or something, because I could never get a usable guitar sound going this route. There was either too much feedback or the signal was not loud enough to be usable.

I had to think around this problem. How could I get a signal that sounds as good as the amp (and that little Fender amp does sound good) into the computer? Then I started looking at the computer’s microphone (the standard one that came with the computer). And I had a moment of inspiration. “What if I mic’d the amp?” I thought.

Image hosted by Photobucket.comHaving a little bit of an idea of acoustics (not much though), I wound up taking a large box and putting the amp into it. I further put two pillows and a quilt in the box to absorb any echo and put the mic barely in the box at a corner opposite the amp. Image hosted by Photobucket.comThis setup, as white-trash fabulous as it may be, worked quite well. I was able to lay down guitar and bass tracks this way and synch it all up in Cool Edit. Took about an hour to do all this (after the drum track was already done). I am not linking to this experiment because it sucks donkey balls. But it proved to me the process was sound.

Now I was cooking. I might have been cooking with an MRE heater, but it was still a form of cooking. I was at a point where I had to decide what I wanted to record. It had to be something simple (because I can play nothing but), but something I liked also. After a few different ideas, I decided on Some Kind of Hate by The Misfits. I chose the song primarily because the drum track was very easy.

Regardless of ease on the drums, it was still a time-consuming process. The demo version of DRUMS does not allow you to save, so if you commit to it, you have to do the whole song at once. I believe it took me two or three hours to get it down. But once I did, the rest of the process was pretty easy.

I did this all at night, after the wife and kids went to bed … this is an important note for later.

After setting all the equipment up (pretty quick when you leave everything prepped, it took maybe 10 minutes) I recorded the guitar track. It’s important to note that you have to keep track of your input and outputs (via your computer’s audio control panel). ‘Cause if you want to use the drum track as a click track, you cannot have to mute the record portion of that input, which I think would be wave. The mic would be Line In or microphone, depending on what all inputs you have.

Amazingly, I got the bass done in one take and it only took two or three takes to get the guitar down. Simple songs are lovely.

I mixed down the guitars and drums and came up with a good sounding instrumental track. I normalized everything and that was a mistake. The short little solo in the middle lost it’s punch and I had to play around with crap for a while to get it right. I finally got it punched up enough, but it never sounded quite right after that. I also added some Chorus and a little more distortion to the track via Cool Edit’s effects. CE’s chorus effects are awesome. I can think of very little music that can’t benefit from Chorus.

Image hosted by Photobucket.comNow came a new problem … vocals. I have a real Nady mic I was going to try to use, but because of the bad sound card, I could get nothing useable. What I did not think of, and, in retrospect I wish I had, was to run the vox through my practice amp. But, I wound up singing dry directly into the computer mic. This didn’t work out very well. Singing through the amp I could have “heard” myself better, not so this way. Plus, it was about 2 or 3 in the morning and I was trying to keep my voice down. So the vox turned out like crap.

I tried a lot of things to punch up the vox, but regardless of what I did, I couldn’t fix the fact that I was flat and lacked dynamic range because I wasn’t singing at my normal volume. So I turned down the vox in the mix and let it ride.

Here is the finished product. It’s in MP3 format and is about 2MB. If you’re not familiar with the song, it’s punk, but this song’s SFW.

The sad thing is, I did this to prove that I could get a decent-sounding recording given pretty standard equipment that any musician would have. After proving that to myself, I haven’t done any more recording and I wish I would.

Here is the link to the Cool Edit Pro 2.1 I talked about. (It's now called Adobe Audition and I don't even know if this download is good anymore.)

Here’s the link to the Drums! Demo I talked about.

Previous installments:
Part 25: Charvel sucks
Part 24: I'm lazy
Part 23: Rob Zombie's Educated Horses, a review
Part 22.5: An awesome video
Part 22: Fretting over the board
Part 21.4: A shout out;
Part 21: Cop Out;
Part 20: Lenny Kravitz;
Part 19: Is it guitar or is it Korg?;
Part 18: A beautiful guitar;
Part 17: Getting all amped up over the sound;
Part 16: Not quite plug and play;
Part 15.25: Don't let Gibson buy your company;
Part 15: The greatest guitarist you've never heard of;
Part 14: The finish;
Part 13: Vernon Reid;
Part 12: The vibrato tremolo;
Part 11: Jimmy Page;
Part 10: What's in the wood?;
Part 9: Rebuilding a guitar;
Part 8: G3 2005;
Part 7: John Petrucci;
Part 6: Chingon;
Part 5: Home recording on the cheapity cheap;
Part 4.01: Guitar Zen;
Part 4: Full service Friday -- concert going in 1993;
Part 3.5: Gretsch guitars;
Part 3: The Reverend Horton Heat;
Part 2: Back when I thought I could play;
Part 1: Zakk Wylde then and now