Friday, January 27, 2006

Because I’m All About the Guitar Pt. 14: The Finish

A couple of BIAAtGs ago I talked about different woods used in guitar manufacture. I also mentioned that woods, their musical properties and how people like to employ them has almost as much to do with mojo as it has to do with the properties of the wood. I didn't feel too much like tackling the subject of mojo then, but now I've decided to take on a topic that is more mojo-ridden in the world of guitars than any other - the guitar finish.

I'm going to say this up front, for those of you who are just skimming or just want to look at the pretty pictures, for all the descriptions and detail I go into about the processes, etc. of finishing, when it comes to sound: thin finish = better.

So, why go into any of the following? Because, how do you know one finish from the next? AND, if you do know how to tell or what to ask, the reasons why some of the stuff is the way it is, is weird.

Before I begin talking about finish, I should probably talk a little bit about the physics of a guitar's sound. We know that an acoustic guitar makes sound by amplifying the plucked string. The sound of the string itself is amplified by the big hollow body. There are many factors, including finish, that goes into the quality, quantity and length of that sound.

Electric guitars are a bit more difficult. They are amplified by magnetic pickups. The movement of the string creates a signal that is run to an amplifier. So, we're technically not amplifying the string "sound" but rather the disturbance of the magnetic field.

The amount the string vibrates particularly influences the guitar tone, resonance and sustain in both electric and acoustic guitars. So, why is this important? Well, the finish of the guitar can directly effect the string vibrations and the resonance of the wood. Hence thin finish = better ... generally.

There are many, many, many, many different types of guitar finishes and systems. I'm going to cover some of the more popular and generic versions as most the others are variations of these. I'm not covering these chronologically, but rather Cullenlogically, which is to say with lack of logical progression but with method of madness.

Click images for full-size images.

Image hosting by Photobucket"Classic" guitar paint jobs, nitrocellulose lacquer finish First, I should say, this isn't a classic guitar, but rather a reproduction made in that style. This is what most of the late '50s early '60s model Fenders and some Gibsons look like today. The guitar manufacturers used really thin and very few layers of paint with a really thin layer of nitrocellulose lacquer. As you can see, is isn't a long-lasting finish. It wears greatly with use. But one of the reasons these guitars are so highly sought after is because of these thin finishes. The belief being that these finishes effect the guitar so slightly that the tone of the wood and strings really shines through. There are those who think that this is bunk, and that for other reasons -- electronics, wood, etc.-the instruments sound superior. "Vintage" electronics are also the subject of much contention though. It seems to me, that pickup technology has come a long way. I read somewhere that the reason people think these instruments sound so much better is because, over time, they've had different repairs done to them and had electronics replaced to make them sound better while keeping that same thin finish. I tend to agree.

Image hosting by PhotobucketPolyester Finish The late '70s and '80s were the heyday of outrageous paint jobs adorning the guitars of our favorite bands. Eddie's strips, Zach's bullseye, blocks, pictures, portraits, stickers, and just about anything else you can think of adorned the guitars. Here's the thing, as rock got more aggressive, the tone of the guitar started to lose it's importance. A cool looking guitar with tons of goop on it could amply deliver the needed sound as long as the electronic hardware was in place. So there came layers and layers of thick paint and thicker finishes. Polyester resin is a very common finish used today. It's easy and cheap for guitar companies to use and make their instruments look good. The majority of guitars you see on the stands today have polyester finishes. For that matter, the majority of pianos you see today have this same finish.

The advantages are that polyester finishes are very tough. They last a long time and look good for a long time. The bad thing is, as I hinted at above, this thicker finish dampens sound. The thick finish doesn't allow the wood and therefore, the strings, to vibrate as well as thinner finishes. Tone is dampened, sustain is cut. BUT, if you're playing hard rock or metal, this isn't very important. You're playing off the tone of your pickups and amp more anyway. However, if you're playing jazz or blues, you should be very concerned about this.

On acoustics, you can imagine that these finishes would more directly effect the sound. You would be right. If you're shopping acoustics, I would avoid any that has a solid color paint job.

Image hosting by PhotobucketJet Guitars, like the one pictured here, use very thin polyester finishes. Jet guitars are considered some of the highest quality electric guitars ever built.

For buyers of electrics there are ways to tell if the guitar you're looking at has a polyester or nitro finish. First, if you're picking it up off the rack and it has a name on it that you recognize, you should automatically assume it has a polyester finish. You can ask the salesperson for documentation. You can also ask the salesperson to take off one of the strap buttons. Look at the hole where the button is screwed to the guitar. If you see a thick layer of paint and finish, it's poly. If there's hardly any noticeable distance between finish and wood, it's either a really good poly job or it's nitro. But, the big thing to keep in mind here is that you should play the instruments through the kind of amplification you have/want to have and see for yourself. Regardless of if it's poly or nitro, there are plenty of good-sounding guitars using both finishes. Experiment.

Image hosting by PhotobucketNatural Oil So, the best possible sound would be a guitar with no finish, right? Ideally, yes. The problem is that the natural oils and gunk on the human body will destroy the wood over time. Many people hate finishes on their guitar necks, sand it off, only to regret it when they have to replace the necks a couple of years down the road. So, most high-end manufacturers and big-name custom shops offer the next best thing - an oil finish.

Advantages: An oil finish, like tung oil or even Miniwax Antique Finishes are actually a shellac-based oil finish. They don't block the pores of the wood thereby allowing the instrument to sing. It also feels most natural and your hand doesn't get stuck on a gunky neck like on highly finished necks. Oil finishes can be colored to warm up certain woods. Oil finishes are easy to apply.

Disadvantages: Oil finishes don't last very long. You have to reapply finish every so often - depending on how often it's handled. Also, while protecting the wood from the oils and dirt on your hands and arms, it doesn't protect the wood from scratches and dings from playing. If your guitar is made from a softer wood like Alder or Basswood, it's not a good idea to have an oil finish as it will get dinged up quickly. While this may be an advantage to some, to others it's a turn off - the finish doesn't get nice and shiny like a nitro or poly finish does. You'll always have a dull, "satin" finish.

Image hosting by PhotobucketFrench Polish This is probably the oldest method of achieving a high-polish shine on a musical instrument. French Polishing was first used on fine furniture and was adopted by violin makers. It is a labor-intensive process that involves a lot of hand buffing (polishing) to put many small layers of shellac on an instrument.

Very accomplished French polishers will color different shellacs to create different burst effects. The practical upshot of this process is that it creates a beautiful, durable finish that is very light. Giving you a finish that rivals a nitro with nearly the amazing clarity of an oil finish. Of course, such labor don't come cheap. You can expect to pay hundreds if not thousands more for an instrument that has a French polish. Ed Roman ("bargain" high-end pricing) offers a French polish finish on his Quicksilver guitars for $350. I consider that a bargain.


I hope you enjoyed this look into the world of guitar finishes. I barely scratched the surface. I didn't go into the different dyes or how one finish "burns" into its previous layers or how another finish layers on top of itself. I didn't talk about buffing or drying or applying or environmental considerations. What I hope I did is whet your appetite to find out more information.

If you do want to learn more, please visit the Musical Instrument Maker's Forum. If you register (it's free!), you have access to their library and TONS of information about building your own guitar, or maybe just touching up one that you already own.

1 comment:

Free Guitar Lesson said...

Hello! Blog surfing(as usual) and I found you guys. Nice feeling here. I'll come back . Keep up more stuff about Guitars, please.
All the best, Guitars